Tag Archives: India

Wikileaks: US political interests in water issues

Wikileaks logo

Leaked diplomatic cables from US embassies published to date by Wikileaks give an indication of US political interests in international water issues. These generally relate to transboundary water disputes and terrorism, corruption, political instability, and US business interests.

Transboundary water disputes and terrorism

When US Senator John Kerry spoke to Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari on 16 February 2010, he suggested that “cooperation on counter terrorism with the Indians could lead to Indian compromises on key Pakistani issues such as Kashmir and water use” [1]. Pakistan claims that the Baglihar Dam in the Indian-administered part of the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir is obstructing the flow of the Chenab river into their country [2].

A 2006 cable on the bioterror threat in India, quoted experts saying that biological warfare agents would be diluted in municipal water supplies, but could threaten smaller bodies of water such as apartment water tanks, urban water trucks and rural wells [3].

Continue reading

Water stress: new map identifies ‘high risk’ countries

Water Stress 2011 map - Maplecroft
China, India, the Middle East and North Africa, and Southern Africa are all rated as ‘high risk’ in a new study evaluating the vulnerability of 159 countries to water stress.

The Water Stress Index is developed by global risks advisory firm Maplecroft to identify the risks to governments, populations and business. The index is calculated by evaluating the ratio of a country’s total water use, from domestic, industrial and agricultural use, to the renewable supply of water from precipitation, streams, rivers and groundwater. The index is accompanied by a sub-national map, which utilises GIS (Geographic Information System) technology to pinpoint global water stress down to 50km² worldwide.

Population growth and rising global temperatures mean that water stress will continue to be a challenge for governments, business and society.

Continue reading

UN experts call for sanitation for all by 2025

UN experts urge the world community to set a new target, beyond the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of a 50 percent improvement in access to adequate sanitation by 2015, to the achievement of 100 percent coverage by 2025.

The experts have published a new report that offers 9-point prescription for achieving the Sanitation MDG by 2015.

Far more people in India have access to a cell phone than to a toilet and improved sanitation.

Recent UN research in India, the world’s second most populous country, shows roughly 366 million people (31 percent of the population) had access to improved sanitation in 2008.

Other data, meanwhile, shows 545 million cell phones are now connected to service in India’s emerging economy. The number of cell phones per 100 people has exploded from 0.35 in year 2000-01 to about 45 today.

Worldwide some 1.1 billion people defecate in the open. And data show progress in creating access to toilets and sanitation lags far behind world MDG targets, even as mobile phone connections continue to a predicted 1 billion in India by 2015.

Says Zafar Adeel, Director of United Nations University’s Canada-based think-tank for water, the Institute for Water, Environment and Health: “It is a tragic irony to think that in India, a country now wealthy enough that roughly half of the people own phones, about half cannot afford the basic necessity and dignity of a toilet.”

“Popular education about the health dangers of poor sanitation is also needed. But this simple measure could do more to save lives, especially those of young people, improve health and help pull India and other countries in similar circumstances out of poverty than any alternative investment. It can also serve as a very significant boost to the local economy.”

The new UNU report cites a rough cost of $300 to build a toilet, including labour, materials and advice. Worldwide, an estimated $358 billion is needed between now and 2015 to reach the MDG for sanitation – some of this funding is already mobilized at national and international levels.

“The world can expect, however, a return of between $3 and $34 for every dollar spent on sanitation, realized through reduced poverty and health costs and higher productivity – - an economic and humanitarian opportunity of historic proportions,” adds Dr. Adeel, who also serves as chair of UN-Water, a coordinating body for water-related work at 27 UN agencies and their many global partners.

[I]f current global trends continue [there will be] a 1 billion person shortfall from the MDG sanitation goal in 2015 — in all, 2.7 billion will lack access. So, while the world will miss the MDG target, the absolute number of those without access to sanitation will actually go up.

The problem is a major contributor to water-borne diseases that, in the past three years alone, killed an estimated 4.5 million children under the age of five — a death toll roughly equal to the population of Ireland or Costa Rica.

“This report [1] notes cultural taboos surround this issue in some countries, preventing progress,” says Zafar Adeel, Director of UNU-INWEH. “Anyone who shirks the topic as repugnant, minimizes it as undignified, or considers unworthy those in need should let others take over for the sake of 1.5 million children and countless others killed each year by contaminated water and unhealthy sanitation.”

The UNU-INWEH report synthesizes information from a wide range of UN and sources:

  • Of the estimated $358 billion cost to meet the MDG target, $142 billion is needed to expand coverage (mostly to rural areas) and $216 billion to maintain existing services (mostly in urban areas)
  • For all of Africa to meet the water and sanitation MDGs, the number of people served must double from the 350 million served in 2006. At current rates of progress in Sub-Saharan Africa, the sanitation MDG might not be met until 2076
  • An estimated 443 million school days are lost each year due to water-related diseases
  • Once girls reach puberty, lack of access to sanitation becomes a central cultural and human health issue, contributing to female illiteracy and low levels of education, in turn contributing to a cycle of poor health for pregnant women and their children

The report offers nine recommendations:

  • Address sanitation in the context of global poverty and in concert with the other MDGs as part of an overall strategy to increase global equity;
  • Make sanitation a primary focus within the broader context of water management and access to safe water;Integrate sanitation into community life – holistic, community-based and communitydriven.
  • Empower local communities (not just households) to identify needs, change behaviour, create demand for ownership and overcome obstacles such as land tenure;
  • Make coordinated, long-term sanitation investments focused on both “software” (usage) and “hardware” (facilities). To make monitoring more valuable, integrate failures and successes associated with sanitation delivery in community-based evaluations;
  • Redefine “acceptable” sanitation access within the context of gender, economic realities and environmental constraints;
  • Adjust the MDG target from a 50 percent improvement in access to adequate sanitation by 2015 to 100 percent coverage by 2025;
  • Co-ordinate the responses of national NGOs to the sanitation crisis and enhance communication, especially regarding lessons learned, to form an effective and vocal sanitation advocacy group;
  • Design new business models to develop markets at the bottom of the pyramid and deal with the apexes of the water-sanitation-hygiene triangle concurrently;
  • Recommit to official development assistance equal to 0.7 percent of GDP and, within this framework, commit 0.002 percent of GDP to international investments in sanitation.

Says Dr. Adeel: “As president of the G8 in 2010, Canada has announced it will champion ‘a major initiative to improve the health of women and children in the world’s poorest regions,’ making this the top priority of the leaders’ meetings in June. Better nutrition and immunization are foremost among the remedies cited.”

“We would urge, however, that providing decent sanitation be emphasized among the simple, inexpensive solutions available, as it would do more to save the lives than any other possible measure.”

Says report co-author Corinne Shuster-Wallace of UNU-INWEH: “Sanitation for all is not only achievable, but necessary. There is a moral, civil, political and economic need to bring adequate sanitation to the global population.”

[1] UNU-INWEH (2010). Sanitation as a key to global health : voices from the field. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health. Read the full report

Source: UNU-INWEH, Apr 2010

Emergencies: water-related lessons from earthquakes

As aid agencies launch Haiti earthquake relief efforts, a blog post on the Overseas Development Institute web site, has showcased a report by learning and accountability network, ALNAP [Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action], outlining 28 lessons learned over 30 years of earthquake responses.

The report covers the 1976 Guatemala earthquake that killed 23,000 people and the 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake that left 5,749 dead. Earthquakes are uniquely challenging, with high mortality rates, severe road and infrastructure destruction, debris delaying recovery efforts and the risk of aftershocks, stated ALNAP in the 2008 report.

“Every time there is a major evaluation, it states [that] emergency responses did not apply lessons from previous emergencies,” ALNAP head of research and development, Ben Ramalingam, told IRIN. “Decisions we make now in Haiti can influence the way operations go for quite some time.”

He has high hopes. Comparing Haiti now with the immediate aftermath of the 2004 tsunami, he says: “Now there is much more focus on what can be done better; there is a lot of debate about coordination and quality – this is potentially unique.”

The most important lesson aid agencies must apply is to address emergency relief and longer-term recovery efforts together, ALNAP says. “Recovery is the overriding challenge. Agency planning should not overstate the need for relief, and should quickly move into recovery activities.”

Physical recovery is likely to take three to five years in Haiti.

Recovery

“In Haiti recovery is also social, political and economic – not just physical – and there is a limit to what humanitarian assistance can do in this,” Ramalingam said. “The entire international community needs to rise to this challenge.”

Other immediate priorities for Haiti include identifying an institution – be it existing government bodies, the UN or the American administration – to lead the response, he pointed out.

And when planning their response all aid groups must not forget a simple lesson: “The majority of life-saving work in any disaster is done by populations themselves… the most important resource Haitians have is their own social capital. Agencies must give good information to communities so they can plan their own recovery from the start.”

Two water-related lessons from the ALNAP report:

  • Do not overstate the risk of disease as this leads to misallocation of resources. Only three out of 600 geophysical disasters led to disease epidemics, according to research published in the Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal. The real risk posed by dead bodies after natural disasters is mental illness caused by shock and grief. [The ALNAP report (p. 11) states that "outbreaks of communicable disease are rare after natural disasters unless large numbers are displaced from their homes and placed in camps". It warns against wasting money on "imaginary" problems, using an example from the 2004 Tsunami disaster: "Even though there was no confirmed case of cholera in Aceh, an immunisation campaign targeted 160,000 people with preparations for cholera using an expensive twodose oral vaccine"].
  • Livelihoods are key to recovery; listen to affected populations about their priorities for livelihood recovery. [The ALNAP report (p. 18) cites the example of the earthquake disaster in Bam (Iran) where "interveners gave a low priority to irrigation for orchards, ranking such support lower than shelter, schools and drinking water. The affected population gave water for orchards their highest priority because of the risk of losing their orchard assets".]

Other lessons from the ALNAP report:

  • Give cash and buy locally wherever possible. Ramalingam warns this must be applied carefully in Haiti given security concerns.
  • Focusing on emergency shelter while neglecting permanent shelter is a mistake. The most sensible solution is “transitional shelter” that can be turned into permanent dwellings.
  • Recovery operations are not neutral. They will reinforce or reduce existing inequalities and must be actively designed to do the latter.
  • Listen to recipients and make sure the assistance is appropriate.
  • Be prepared for land-ownership disputes.
  • Try to build back better, for instance by improving building codes, but be realistic; disaster response is not a magic bullet.

Source: IRIN, 21 Jan 2010

Cholera vaccine seen safe, effective in India-study

An India-made cholera vaccine that meets World Health Organization (WHO) standards has proven to be safe and effective in young children in a part of India where the disease is endemic, a new study says.

The researchers, who published their study results in The Lancet [1], hope the vaccine can soon be rolled out in developing countries where cholera remains endemic.

The trial involved 107,774 participants in Kolkata in eastern India, half of whom were given the vaccine and the other half a placebo. The vaccine was orally administered in two doses, at least 14 days apart [between July and September 2006] , and the researchers tracked the participants for two years.

On average, there were 20 episodes of cholera in the vaccine group and 68 episodes in the placebo group, which meant the vaccine had a protective efficacy rate of 67 percent, the researchers said. There were no adverse events linked to the vaccine.

“This … trial shows that the modified killed-whole-cell oral vaccine is safe and efficacious, providing nearly 70 percent protection against clinically significant cholera for at least 2 years after vaccination,” wrote the researchers, led by John Clemens at the International Vaccine Research Institute (IVI) in Seoul, South Korea. “Protection was seen in children vaccinated at ages under 5 years, as well as in older individuals.”

An earlier version of this vaccine has been used in Viet Nam. Though it is effective, it has never been approved for use elsewhere because the manufacturing process in Viet Nam did not reliably remove cholera toxin from the vaccine, the researchers said. Furthermore, Viet Nam’s national regulatory authority is not WHO-approved.

IVI worked with Vietnamese manufacturer VaBiotech to improve the vaccine and production has since been transferred to vaccine maker Shantha Biotechnics in Hyderabad in India, where the national regulatory authority is WHO-approved.

Cholera causes 120,000 deaths every year worldwide, according to the WHO.

The study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Governments of South Korea, Sweden, and Kuwait.

[1] Dipika Sur, M. … [et al.] (2009). Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 9 October 2009. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297 [Free registration required].

See also: Sanitation vs. vaccination in cholera control, Sanitation Updates, 15 May 2009

Source: Tan Ee Lyn, Reuters, 08 Oct 2009

Water Tops Climate Change as Global Priority

International survey finds fresh water pollution, scarcity drive public concern.

Valentin Pérez Hernandez, a young gardener from Mexico City, moves daily between the two water realities of the nation’s capital: though the immense city is roiled by fierce water shortages, fecal contamination, industrial pollution, and old infrastructure that too often fails, the posh Jardines del Pedregal section where he works is a green and colorful oasis supplied with unusual water abundance. Photo: Circle of Blue

Valentin Pérez Hernandez, a young gardener from Mexico City, moves daily between the two water realities of the nation’s capital: though the immense city is roiled by fierce water shortages, fecal contamination, industrial pollution, and old infrastructure that too often fails, the posh Jardines del Pedregal section where he works is a green and colorful oasis supplied with unusual water abundance. Photo: Circle of Blue

A comprehensive Circle of Blue | GlobeScan international public opinion survey on attitudes about fresh water sustainability, management and conservation finds that people around the world view water issues as the planet’s top environmental problem, greater than air pollution, depletion of natural resources, loss of habitat and even climate change.

The poll, funded by the Molson Coors Brewing Company, surveyed 1,000 people in each of 15 countries, and probed 500 in each of the following countries on specific questions: Canada, China, India, Mexico, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.

The survey was made public in Stockholm, Sweden, on 18 August 2009 during World Water Week.

The fierce impediments to clean water and sanitation, and the millions of premature deaths from water-related disease are seen as having a greater influence on quality of life and the planet than air pollution, species extinction, depletion of natural resources, loss of habitat and climate change.

More than 90 percent of those polled expressed a conviction that access to clean, fresh water is fundamental, not only for themselves but for all people. Across the globe, respondents to the survey also said education was essential to help people understand the dimensions and the urgency of the crisis.

In response to the survey data, Circle of Blue commissioned some of the world’s best photojournalists to document in pictures and words various facets of the conclusions in seven countries.

A close look at the survey results found considerable consistency, as well as significant variability, in how people view the global fresh water crisis. Among the other consequential findings:

  • People around the world view water pollution as the most important facet of the fresh water crisis; shortages of fresh water are very close behind. Concern about both issues tended to be higher in developing countries than in developed nations.
  • People in Mexico and India, which are growing rapidly and rely heavily on agriculture for jobs and economic development, expressed the highest level of concern about water shortages in the farm sector.
  • In all seven countries, respondents consistently said that governments were the most responsible for ensuring clean water.
  • The respondents said that large companies were nearly as responsible as governments for ensuring clean water; nearly eight of 10 respondents from the seven nations said that solving drinking water problems “will require significant help from companies.”
  • In an expression of the results of $1 trillion dollars invested in regulations and water delivery and treatment infrastructure in the last two decades, Americans said they were less worried about safe drinking water and pollution than people in most of the other countries, though more than half still expressed concerns.
  • Except for India, where 60 percent of respondents said they were “very concerned,” well under half of the respondents in the six other nations surveyed said they were not terribly worried about the “high cost” of water.

    Download the complete GlobeScan/Circle of Blue Report [pdf]

    Visit the Water Views page with graphics, a feature story, country profiles, photo stories and videos.

    Sanitation vs. vaccination in cholera control

    IVI scientist Dr. Anna Lena Lopez with local children during oral cholera vaccine trial in Kolkata, India, Aug 2006. Photo: IVI

    IVI scientist Dr. Anna Lena Lopez with local children during oral cholera vaccine trial in Kolkata, India, Aug 2006. Photo: IVI

    Only weeks away from the launch in India of an oral cholera vaccine significantly cheaper than available vaccines, community workers and health officials are still sceptical of whether a vaccine is the best way to control cholera, according to the International Vaccine Institute (IVI).

    IVI’s director John Clemens told IRIN some water and sanitation programme managers argue that the focus in cholera control should be on safe water access rather than vaccine development.

    [...] Introducing a cheaper vaccine in endemic countries “does not mean diminishing the importance of safe water access”, said IVI’s Clemens. “It is a false dichotomy to pit sanitation against vaccination. Improved water and sanitation is the ultimate, but still far-off, goal for impoverished [endemic] countries. Meanwhile we need to think about inexpensive ways to augment efforts [to control cholera].”

    Clemens told IRIN that despite a decade of education about the importance of sanitation and safe drinking water, cholera infections have not declined. “Rather, in recent years there have been unprecedented outbreaks of unprecedented duration [in places] where [cholera] had not been [as serious] a problem in recent years.”

    [...] People living in countries hardest hit by cholera can ill afford the only internationally licensed vaccine sold as Dukarol, Clemens told IRIN. [...] Dukarol can cost up to US$30 per dose and requires at least two doses with boosters. IVI’s new vaccine, Shanchol, is expected to cost about $1 per dose and calls for two doses.

    Other more affordable oral vaccines are not licensed internationally.

    IVI’s oral vaccine is in the final phase of a clinical trial in India where 70,000 patients have been tracked since 2006. The manufacturer is expecting to produce five million doses in the first year of immunisations. IVI’s director said the vaccine has not been tested on infants under one year old. IVI, based in Seoul, South Korea, started cholera research in 1999 with almost $40 million from The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The institute received an additional $20 million in 2006 to introduce a cholera vaccine in endemic countries. As the cholera vaccine is licensed only in India, IVI will seek WHO’s approval in late 2009.

    See IVI’s page on its cholera vaccine programme.

    Source: IRIN, 14 May 2009

    PepsiCo Agrees to Policy Respecting Human Right to Water

    PepsiCo is the first publicly traded, multinational corporation to create a policy in support of the human right to water.

    In 2003, PepsiCo’s water-use license was revoked in Pudussery, India, because of claims that its bottling plants there were over-consuming and depleting community groundwater, which is a direct violation of the Human Right to Water. When NorthStar Asset Management, a Boston-based investment management firm found itself with shares of PepsiCo in its portfolio, it submitted a shareowner proposal directing PepsiCo to create a policy articulating its commitment to the Human Right to Water.

    The shareowner resolution, crafted with the help of water justice experts at the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC), an international human rights organization [and later on supported by Boston Common Asset Management] was [successfully] submitted for the 2008 proxy season.

    In December 2008, PepsiCo contacted NorthStar and asked for an example of the kind of policy the investment firm would like to see it adopt. In March [2009], NorthStar announced that PepsiCo had agreed to adopt an official policy in support of the human right to water. PepsiCo is the first publicly traded, multinational corporation to create such a policy.

    Read the PepsiCo Guidelines in Support of the Human Right to Water

    Source: Robert Kropp, SRI, 28 Apr 2009 – see also: PepsiCo Marks World Water Day and Reaffirms Commitment to Responsible Water Stewardship, PepsiCo, 20 Mar 2009