Tag Archives: Gates Foundation

SEI and SuSanA to lead new sanitation learning & sharing platform for Gates Foundation

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has chosen the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) and the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) to lead a new sanitation learning and sharing platform.

The Gates Foundation’s Sanitation Science and Technology Programme has over 80 projects. SEI and SuSanA have been tasked to share the results from these projects in an open public forum engaging a broad range of experts and the general public.

Over the next 15 months SEI will work with the Programme Grantees of the Foundation in order to broaden understanding and discussion about their work. The grantees will be encouraged to work through SuSanA that has about 200 institutional members and some 2000 discussants on its Discussion Forum (www.forum.susana.org).

In August 2012, the Foundation gave a grant to the Water and Sanitation for   Africa (WSA) to set up the Africa Sanitation Think Tank (ASTT).

Related web sites:

SourceSEI, 09 Nov 2012

NGO columnist questions effectiveness of Gates Foundation WASH programme

The technology and innovation-focused search for a silver bullet for the WASH sector by the Gates Foundation is flawed, argues the director of a water NGO. Improving sanitation for people in developing countries requires person-to-person education within each community, writes Water 1st International’s Marla Smith-Nilson in the Seattle Times. How many more people has the Gates Foundation given access to water and toilets as a result of its US$ 200 million expenditure over the past six years, asks Smith-Nilson?

I’d like some evidence that their approach is effective and not just driven by the desire to invent a philanthropic silver bullet. Meaningful results to me are how many women are no longer carrying water and how many people now use a toilet instead of defecating behind a bush?

Continue reading

Gates Foundation awards $10.9 million to study impacts of sanitation on diseases

Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, have received a five-year, $10.9 million grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to evaluate several interventions to combat diarrheal disease in developing countries.

Dr. Jack Colford

Dr. Jack Colford, professor of epidemiology at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health, will coordinate the project, working with the International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B) and Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA).

An estimated 2.2 million children under the age of 5 die from diarrhoeal diseases each year, according to the World Health Organization. Most of these diseases are thought to be preventable with improvements in sanitation, water quality and hygiene.

Due to the high cost of developing and maintaining large infrastructure projects, such as networked water, there is now a movement toward simpler, alternative methods to improve health in rural areas. However, there is almost no evidence that allows direct comparison of the health benefits or cost effectiveness of these simpler interventions, such as improved latrines, household water treatment and hand washing with soap.

The goal of the new project is to determine how sanitation interventions, delivered alone or as part of combined intervention packages, impact child health and well-being. In addition to improved sanitation, the intervention packages will include drinking water improvements and hand washing solutions. The results have the potential to influence how billions of dollars are directed towards long-term improvements in health and economic outcomes for millions of children each year, said Colford.

“Increasingly, foundations, governments, the World Bank and development agencies such as the MCC (Millennium Challenge Corporation) are demanding evidence of effectiveness when awarding development funds,” said Colford. “Right now, it is unknown whether single interventions are as cost effective as combinations of these interventions. This grant will fund the first large-scale, randomized impact evaluation designed to gather rigorous evidence about this question.”

The study will test the impact of these sanitation, water and hygiene interventions using a large-scale, randomized impact evaluation in Bangladesh and Kenya. These two countries are representative of the two regions that account for the majority of the world’s gastrointestinal disease burden: Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. The researchers expect to enroll a total of 23,000 children in the trials, which will be monitored by several institutional review boards.

Of the $10.9 million, about $7.9 million will be subcontracted out to the two field sites. Dr. Stephen Luby, head of the Programme on Infectious Diseases and Vaccine Sciences with ICDDR,B, and Michael Kremer, Ph.D., a research affiliate with IPA, will lead the trials in Bangladesh and Kenya, respectively. They will be joined by a team of experts from various disciplines, including public health, economics, behavioral change, nutrition, cognitive development and tropical enteropathy.

Source: Linda Anderberg, UC Berkely News, 05 Nov 2009

Cholera vaccine seen safe, effective in India-study

An India-made cholera vaccine that meets World Health Organization (WHO) standards has proven to be safe and effective in young children in a part of India where the disease is endemic, a new study says.

The researchers, who published their study results in The Lancet [1], hope the vaccine can soon be rolled out in developing countries where cholera remains endemic.

The trial involved 107,774 participants in Kolkata in eastern India, half of whom were given the vaccine and the other half a placebo. The vaccine was orally administered in two doses, at least 14 days apart [between July and September 2006] , and the researchers tracked the participants for two years.

On average, there were 20 episodes of cholera in the vaccine group and 68 episodes in the placebo group, which meant the vaccine had a protective efficacy rate of 67 percent, the researchers said. There were no adverse events linked to the vaccine.

“This … trial shows that the modified killed-whole-cell oral vaccine is safe and efficacious, providing nearly 70 percent protection against clinically significant cholera for at least 2 years after vaccination,” wrote the researchers, led by John Clemens at the International Vaccine Research Institute (IVI) in Seoul, South Korea. “Protection was seen in children vaccinated at ages under 5 years, as well as in older individuals.”

An earlier version of this vaccine has been used in Viet Nam. Though it is effective, it has never been approved for use elsewhere because the manufacturing process in Viet Nam did not reliably remove cholera toxin from the vaccine, the researchers said. Furthermore, Viet Nam’s national regulatory authority is not WHO-approved.

IVI worked with Vietnamese manufacturer VaBiotech to improve the vaccine and production has since been transferred to vaccine maker Shantha Biotechnics in Hyderabad in India, where the national regulatory authority is WHO-approved.

Cholera causes 120,000 deaths every year worldwide, according to the WHO.

The study was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Governments of South Korea, Sweden, and Kuwait.

[1] Dipika Sur, M. … [et al.] (2009). Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 9 October 2009. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297 [Free registration required].

See also: Sanitation vs. vaccination in cholera control, Sanitation Updates, 15 May 2009

Source: Tan Ee Lyn, Reuters, 08 Oct 2009

The Global Health Case Study Initiative

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, World Health Organization’s Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), Global Health Progress (GHP), International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) and Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) have joined together to Form the Global Health Case Study Initiative. This groundbreaking project seeks to create efficiencies by collecting case studies that would provide others with information on current practices and insight on “lessons learned” (both positive and negative) in the course of conducting activities relating to global health matters.

The case studies will highlight collaborations that are built and/or transactions that are entered into which address a global health concern. Global health concern refers to those diseases that have a disproportionate impact on developing countries, but need not be the sole focus of the collaboration or transaction. The intended audience for this initiative includes organizations and individuals who are currently involved or are interested in helping to fulfill global health objectives.

Submission deadline: 01 December 2008

For more information and to submit case studies go to the Global Health Case Study Initiative web site